[sova]

Сообщение от Скинфакси

Я не вижу в Евангелия от Матфея (27:46) искаженного перевода. Конечно, если обратиться к книге Тхелим (22:2) (в Синодальной Библии это Псалмы (21:2)), то читаем на еврейском (всё с права на лево, в том числе и огласовку этого фрагмента русскими буквами):

אלי אלי למה עזבתני

инатбаза хамал илэ илэ

Конечно, слово в греческом Евангелии от Матфея (27:46) переданное как σαβαχθανί (сабахтани или савахфани) не точно соответствует по звучанию еврейскому азабтани. Но ведь одно из этих слов арамейское: сабахтани (савахфани), а другое еврейское: азабтани. Звучат по разному, а смысл одинаков: оставил меня (См. здесь).

В этой статье как раз разъясняется, что звучат слова схоже, но состоят из разных букв и имеют разный смысл:

Сообщение от Ralston Skinner

The record of the New Testament must stand as its own original authority, for it has no other authentic source. We are bound, therefore, to take, accept, and follow, its own statements for what they appear. A Greek sentence, lettering Hebrew words, must be rendered into the Hebrew agreeably to the equivalents of the letters in the Greek text. For instance, and in this case, there are two words in the Hebrew square letter, of the same sound but of different letters and meaning. One is the Chaldee : and the other is the Hebrew . The first is, anglicé, “shâbâk,” meaning to forsake, and the other is shâbâch, meaning to glorify. These words are the ones supposed to be substituted for the word used in the Psalm, azabthani, the pure word for “forsaken me.” If in the Greek text, which is the only guide and authority we have, the word is found as , it cannot properly he rendered otherwise in the Hebrew, or square letter, than by :, or, anglice, shâbâch. The real word of the Greek text is , or in proper conversion :, or shâbâchthani, which does mean “glorify me,” and nothing else. Any change from this must and can be only by perversion, and by way of correction of the text of the New Testament. As used in the climacteric sentence of the whole symbolic fabricated drama, it was taken from the Mysteries, and never had any reality whatever. The matter has been referred to very learned Jews, and surprise has been expressed that in such a manifest difference between the indicated word and the correction adopted, no comment should exist of the fact of discrepancy, probably because it was thought best to slur, rather than lay the symbolic jugglery bare to the unthinking, ignorant herd.

А в конце статьи ЕПБ добавляет, что лично видела эту фразу в неких тайных книгах, описывающих Посвящения:

Сообщение от H.P.Blavatsky

The Editors of Lucifer regret that they cannot give Euphrates chapter and verse in support of the words in question being a sacramental formula used in initiations, since such details can be found only in secret books. But one of the said Editors can give her personal assurance that these words are so given in the secret works on initiation, and that she has herself seen them. Moreover, they were common to all the greater Mysteries—those of Mithra and India, as well as the Egyptian and the Eleusinian.

Перевод статьи на русский должен быть в издании "Сферы", упомянутом в первом посте ветки.