Старый 31.08.2015, 12:02   #56
Час
 
Аватар для Час
 
Рег-ция: 30.08.2015
Сообщения: 199
Благодарности: 3
Поблагодарили 95 раз(а) в 52 сообщениях
По умолчанию Ответ: Атака на Агни Йогу в ТО Британии

Напали, но не сейчас. У них есть и сторонники АЙ потому сначало была массивная обработка этих неверных. Если вы читаете по английски, такие тексты у них были уже много лет:

* If HPB was mistaken in this, then how can we know that she was not mistaken in other things that she said and taught? If this statement of hers was “erroneous” then all her statements may well be erroneous. In which case, why are you even bothering with Theosophy at all, in any shape or form, if it’s built upon such a supposedly shaky and untrustworthy foundation?

* If HPB was mistaken in this, then how come the Masters did not correct the error? If it is an error then it’s a very serious and misleading one, especially considering the definitiveness with which it’s stated. They had ample time and opportunity in which to correct both it and any “misconceptions” arising as a result of it, being able to do so either via HPB herself or via their contact with any of the numerous Theosophists and even non-Theosophists with whom they were at times in written communication during HPB’s lifetime. But the fact is that they refrained from doing this and that they expressed the exact same viewpoint – and at even greater length – in their own letters, such as those that have been published in “The Mahatma Letters.”

* If you wish to believe that HPB was mistaken in this, in order to thus give validity to the claims, teachings, and revelations put forth by post-HPB Theosophists who asserted that they were in direct contact and communication with the Masters, then why exactly is this? What exactly do you have against HPB, her teachings, and the written teachings of the actual Masters themselves, that you would want to rubbish them in this way? What exactly is it that you dislike so much about the original authentic Theosophy that you would want to discard it in favour of the “neo-Theosophy” presented by the likes of Leadbeater, Besant, Bailey et al; this being an entirely different and hugely contradictory system of teaching to that laid out by HPB, W.Q. Judge, and the Masters who stood behind them?
Час вне форума  
Показать ответы на данное сообщение Ответить с цитированием Вверх